Skip to main content

Finding a Pathogenic Mutation on Genetic Testing Does Not Add to Stress or Anxiety in Women with Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer

Web Exclusives - Ovarian Cancer

Genetic testing results do not adversely affect patient-reported quality of life (QOL) among women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. While finding a pathogenic mutation on panel testing had no negative impact on QOL, “negative genetic testing results may allay anxiety for women with ovarian cancer,” concluded investigators of a study of 83 women who had an ovarian cancer diagnosis and underwent genetic testing. Their data were reported in a poster presentation at the 2020 American Society of Clinical Oncology Virtual Scientific Program.

The investigators, led by Sarah S. Lee, MD, Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, New York City, compared patient-reported stress, anxiety, and depression among women who were referred by gynecologic oncologists for genetic counseling and genetic testing as part of a facilitated referral pathway.

Of the 110 women enrolled in the pathway, 83 (76%) underwent genetic testing, and 15 (18%) were found to have potentially actionable pathogenic mutations and 26 (31%) had variants of unknown significance (VUS). Three (4%) had both a pathogenic mutation and a VUS. Forty-two (51%) had negative results on genetic testing.

A total of 60 of 76 English-speaking women completed 3 QOL instruments before and after genetic testing, with 37 completing the QOL assessment at 6 to 9 months post-genetic testing.

In the entire cohort, the results from genetic testing did not affect QOL scales across all time points. All women demonstrated mild stress at each time point and clinically significant anxiety immediately following genetic testing.

Among the entire cohort, a statistically significant decrease in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) depression scores was observed over time from pre-genetic testing to 6 months post-genetic testing (mean score, 4.98 vs 2.97; P = .020). Patients with VUS had lower HADS mean anxiety scores across time (3.62) compared with patients with pathogenic mutations (7.44) or patients who tested negative (6.83) (P = .029).

Among the patients who tested negative for mutations, there was a significant decrease in clinically significant anxiety by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score at 6 months (P = .002) and a decrease in borderline anxiety by HADS scores at 6 months (P = .005). No such decreases were found among patients with pathogenic mutations or VUS.

“Patients should be recommended genetic testing at time of diagnosis of ovarian cancer without concern of increased stress, anxiety, or depression based on genetic testing results,” the investigators concluded.

Related Items
How to Sequence Treatment in Relapsed Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Maintenance Gemogenovatucel-T Immunotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Patient Self-Reporting of Tolerability in Phase 2 Trial Comparing Gemcitabine plus Adavosertib or Placebo in Women with Platinum-Resistant Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Mirvetuximab Soravtansine plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
NeoPembrOV Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with or without Pembrolizumab Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery and Standard Systemic Therapy with or without Pembrolizumab for Advanced High-Grade Serous Carcinoma
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Optimal Treatment Duration of Bevacizumab plus Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Advanced Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Phase 1 Study of GAS6/AXL Inhibitor (AVB-500) in Recurrent, Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Carcinoma
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Anlotinib in Combination with TQB2450 in Patients with Recurrent Ovarian Cancer (ACTION)
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Niraparib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with BRCA-Mutated Ovarian Cancer from 3 Phase 3 Trials
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Real-World Treatment Patterns of Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer