Skip to main content

Results from the STAMP Study: Adjuvant GemCis versus Capecitabine in Patients with Resected Lymph Node–Positive eCCA

2022 Year in Review - Cholangiocarcinoma - Cholangiocarcinoma

Adjuvant capecitabine (CAP) is the current standard of care as adjuvant therapy for patients with resected cholangiocarcinoma (CCA); however, patient outcomes are still suboptimal. The multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 2 STAMP study investigated the role of adjuvant gemcitabine/cisplatin (GemCis) versus standard CAP in patients with resected lymph node–positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA). Results of the STAMP trial were presented at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting.

Between July 2017 and November 2020, the study enrolled patients aged ≥19 years with ECOG performance status 0/1, adenocarcinoma of a perihilar or distal bile duct, ≥1 regional lymph node metastases (N1 or greater), and complete macroscopic (R0 or R1) resection within 12 weeks before being randomly assigned to a treatment group. Patients with distant metastasis, R2 disease, previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or a serum cancer antigen 19.9 level ≥100 U/mL were excluded.

Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 8 cycles of GemCis (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 intravenously [IV], cisplatin 25 mg/m2 IV, on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks) or CAP (1250 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-14, every 3 weeks). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS); secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and safety.

The intention-to-treat population enrolled a total of 101 patients (GemCis group, 50; CAP group, 51). Overall, the primary tumor sites included perihilar bile duct in 45 (44.6%) patients and distal bile duct in 56 (55.4%) patients; 32 (31.7%) patients had R1 resection. Patient characteristics were well-balanced between the 2 arms.

With a median follow-up of 33.4 months, the 2-year DFS rates were numerically higher in the GemCis group compared with the CAP group, 38.5% (90% confidence interval [CI], 29.5%-47.4%) versus 25.1% (90% CI, 17.4%-33.5%), but this difference was not statistically significant (P = .430). The median DFS was 14.3 months in the GemCis group and 11.1 months in the CAP group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; P = .430). The 2-year OS rate was 77.8% in the GemCis group and 71.0% in the CAP group (HR, 1.08; P = .404).

A higher proportion of patients in the GemCis group experienced grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) compared with the CAP group (84% vs 16%). The most common grade 3/4 AE was neutropenia (72%) in the GemCis group and hand-foot skin reaction (8%) in the CAP group.

The results of the STAMP study indicated that GemCis did not improve DFS and OS outcomes compared with CAP in a prognostically homogeneous population of patients with resected lymph node–positive eCCA. Therefore, it was concluded that CAP should remain standard adjuvant therapy in this setting.

Source: Yoo C, Jeong H, Kim K, et al. Adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus capecitabine in patients with resected lymph node–positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (STAMP): a multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 2 study. American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting 2022. Abstract 4019.

Related Items
Key Advances in the Treatment of Patients with BTC in 2023: New Targeted Therapies, Potential Biomarkers, and Combination Strategies
2023 Year in Review - Cholangiocarcinoma published on December 31, 2023 in Cholangiocarcinoma
KEYNOTE-966: Pembrolizumab Combined With GemCis Versus GemCis Alone in Patients With BTC
2023 Year in Review - Cholangiocarcinoma published on December 31, 2023 in Cholangiocarcinoma
Post-hoc Analysis of the ABC-01, -02, and -03 Trials in Patients With Advanced eCCA
2023 Year in Review - Cholangiocarcinoma published on December 31, 2023 in Cholangiocarcinoma
Efficacy and Safety of Tinengotinib in Patients With Advanced Refractory/Relapsed CCA Who Previously Received an FGFR Inhibitor
2023 Year in Review - Cholangiocarcinoma published on December 31, 2023 in Cholangiocarcinoma
KLF5 Inhibition Reduces Tumor Growth and Sensitizes to Chemotherapy-Induced Cell Death in Experimental Models of CCA
2023 Year in Review - Cholangiocarcinoma published on December 31, 2023 in Cholangiocarcinoma
Phase 2 Trial of SHR-1316 Plus IBI310 in Patients With Advanced iCCA After Inadequate Response to First-Line Therapy
2023 Year in Review - Cholangiocarcinoma published on December 31, 2023 in Cholangiocarcinoma
Examination of Patients With CCA Treated With Novel Targeted Therapies After Extended Molecular Profiling on Liquid Biopsies
2023 Year in Review - Cholangiocarcinoma published on December 31, 2023 in Cholangiocarcinoma
Phase 2 Component of the BEER-BTC Study: Comparing Bevacizumab Plus Erlotinib Maintenance Versus Observation in Patients With Advanced BTC
2023 Year in Review - Cholangiocarcinoma published on December 31, 2023 in Cholangiocarcinoma
The DEBATE Trial: Neoadjuvant Durvalumab Plus GemCis Versus GemCis Alone for Patients With Localized BTC
2023 Year in Review - Cholangiocarcinoma published on December 31, 2023 in Cholangiocarcinoma
The Phase 2 ADJUBIL Study of Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab With or Without Capecitabine in BTC
2023 Year in Review - Cholangiocarcinoma published on December 31, 2023 in Cholangiocarcinoma