Skip to main content

Switching to SB5 Biosimilar from Reference Adalimumab in Patients with RA, Axial Spondyloarthritis, or Psoriatic Arthritis

2020 Year in Review - Biosimilars - Biosimilars

Data from the ongoing PROPER study indicate switching from reference adalimumab to its biosimilar SB5 was not associated with any clinically meaningful difference in disease score from baseline in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis, or psoriatic arthritis.

Published real-world data on switching from adalimumab reference to its biosimilar SB5 are limited. To evaluate candidate predictors of SB5 persistence among patients in the European Union who received SB5 across multiple indications, an ongoing observational study (PROPER) was initiated to evaluate persistence with SB5 following reference adalimumab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis (AS), or psoriatic arthritis (PsA); the first interim analysis of this study on baseline characteristics, disease scores, and dose regimen up to 24 weeks post-initiation of SB5 was presented at the American College of Rheumatology Convergence 2020 meeting.

Eligible patients with a diagnosis of RA, AS, PsA, ulcerative colitis, or Crohn’s disease who switched to SB5 following a minimum of 16 weeks of treatment with reference adalimumab, at clinics in Belgium, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom were enrolled in the study; 1200 patients are planned for enrollment. Data were collected retrospectively from clinic records for the 24 weeks prior to switch, and prospectively and/or retrospectively for 48 weeks following switch. The primary end points include baseline clinical characteristics, disease activity scores, and clinical management over time.

At data cutoff on May 1, 2020, 256 patients were included in the interim analysis; of these, 85 patients had a diagnosis of RA, 86 patients had AS, and 85 patients had PsA. In the RA population, the mean age was 59.9 years (standard deviation [SD], 12.8), mean duration of disease was 12.6 years (SD, 17.0), 22.2% had received biologic therapy prior to reference adalimumab, and 83.8% of patients had stable disease at baseline. In the AS population, the mean age was 52.7 years (SD, 13.5), mean duration of disease was 21.9 years (SD, 14.2), 13.3% had received biologic therapy prior to reference adalimumab, and 71.4% of patients had stable disease at baseline. In the PsA population, the mean age was 54.5 years (SD, 12.6), mean duration of disease was 12.2 years (SD, 10.3), 20.5% had received biologic therapy prior to reference adalimumab, and 80.5% of patients had stable disease at baseline.

By week 24 post-transition, no meaningful difference was observed from baseline in disease scores in the RA, AS, or PsA patient cohorts. In each cohort, ≥75% of patients transitioned to the same dose regimen of SB5 as received for reference adalimumab, and the majority of patients continued the same SB5 regimen through week 24.

These real-world data indicate that, consistent with previously reported data from controlled clinical studies, no clinically meaningful differences were seen in disease score from baseline in patients with RA, AS, or PsA who switched from reference adalimumab to its biosimilar SB5; data from additional patients enrolled and longer follow-up are awaited to further confirm these results.

Reference
Müller-Ladner U, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72(suppl 10):Abstract 805.

 

Related Items
Adoption of Biosimilars—Why the Delay?
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Editorial, Biosimilars
Pharmacist-Driven Intervention Significantly Increases Biosimilar Adoption in Clinical Practice
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Biosimilars, Oncology Pharmacy Programs, ASCO Highlights
Comparing Single-Center Outcomes Between Reference and Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Drugs Used for Autologous Stem-Cell Mobilization
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Original Article, Biosimilars, Transplant
Oncologists’ Common Misconceptions About Biosimilars Revealed in a Recent Survey
JHOP - June 2022 Vol 12, No 3 published on June 16, 2022 in Biosimilars, ASCO Highlights
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of the Bevacizumab Biosimilar MIL60 versus Bevacizumab Reference in Patients with Advanced or Recurrent Nonsquamous NSCLC
2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars published on December 31, 2021 in Biosimilars
Same-Day Pegfilgrastim or PFG-cbqv Prophylaxis of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Bendamustine plus Rituximab and CHOP±R Regimens in Patients with Lymphoma and CLL
2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars published on December 31, 2021 in Biosimilars
Same-Day Pegfilgrastim or Pegfilgrastim-cbqv Prophylaxis in miniCHOP Chemotherapy-Based Regimens for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars published on December 31, 2021 in Biosimilars
Demographics and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Bevacizumab-awwb in Real-World Oncology Clinics
2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars published on December 31, 2021 in Biosimilars
Impact of the Oncology Care Model on Use of Bone Supportive Medications, Antiemetics, and Growth Factors
2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars published on December 31, 2021 in Biosimilars
Cost-Efficiency Analysis of Conversion from Pegfilgrastim with On-Body Injector to Pegfilgrastim-jmdb to Provide Budget-Neutral Expanded Access to Prophylaxis and Treatment
2021 Year in Review - Biosimilars published on December 31, 2021 in Biosimilars