Skip to main content
Completed Research: PRACTICE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH
Abstract #CR01

Assessing Student Pharmacists’ Knowledge and Perceptions of Financial Toxicity Concepts Introduced in an Oncology Pharmacotherapy Course

JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature - HOPA Abstracts

Presenting Author: Charles Wight, PharmD, Palm Beach Atlantic University, West Palm Beach, FL

Co-Authors: Matthew DellaVecchia, PhD, and Nicholas Chow, PharmD, BCOP, Palm Beach Atlantic University, West Palm Beach, FL; Monica Tadros, PharmD, BCPS, BCOP, Miami Cancer Institute-Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL

BACKGROUND: Current, standard pharmacy school oncology curricula thoroughly discuss treatment toxicities and patient education. As cancer treatment costs continue to rise, financial toxicity is an increasingly important component of patient education. A national survey of how pharmacy schools incorporate concepts of affordable medication options revealed that the concept of financial toxicity was not described within the context of oncology care. There is no current literature evaluating financial toxicity education within pharmacy oncology courses nor student pharmacists’ knowledge of the concept.

OBJECTIVE: This survey-based study is designed to assess the impact of assigned reading material and lecture-based practice discussions on pharmacy students’ knowledge and perceptions of the concept of financial toxicity in cancer care during an oncology pharmacotherapeutics course.

METHODS: During an oncology pharmacotherapeutics course, a pre-lecture questionnaire was disseminated to students which assessed baseline student knowledge and perceptions of financial toxicity in cancer care. Students were assigned reading materials and participated in a formal lecture-based in-class discussion on the concept of financial toxicity and its implications in pharmacy practice. Students then completed a post-lecture questionnaire designed to assess changes in student knowledge and perceptions of financial toxicity as it relates to cancer care and treatment. The questionnaire consisted of Likert scale, multiple choice, and free response prompts to evaluate defining the concept, its role in cancer care, the resources available for patients, and the pharmacist’s role. All questionnaires were completed within 1 week surrounding the lecture discussions.

RESULTS: A total of 78 pharmacy students participated in the survey. Prior to instruction, 23 (29.5%) students agreed/strongly agreed that they could clearly define the term financial toxicity compared with 73 (93.6%) students post-instruction. In terms of being able to clearly define the role that financial toxicity plays in overall cancer and patient outcomes, 31 (39.7%) students agreed/strongly agreed pre-instruction compared with 71 (91.02%) students post-instruction. Regarding the knowledge of patient resources, 10 (12.8%) students agreed/strongly agreed pre-instruction compared with 55 (70.5%) students post-instruction. Regarding their opinion on the importance of the pharmacist’s role in managing financial toxicity, 65 (83.3%) students agreed/strongly agreed pre-instruction compared with 71 (91%) students post-instruction.

CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the need for increased education on the concept of financial toxicity in oncology pharmacy curricula. It is important that pharmacy students are exposed to this during their coursework and have a basic understanding of financial toxicity on graduation. Based on this study, further financial concepts will be evaluated in this pharmacy school’s oncology curriculum.

  1. Ratain MJ. Biomarkers and Clinical Care. Presented at the AAAS/FDLI Colloquium, Personalized Medicine in an Era of Health Care Reform; Washington, DC; October 27, 2009. http://shr01.aaas.org/projects/personalized_ med/colloquia/ppts/Ratain.pdf
  2. Hussaini SMQ, Gupta A, Dusetzina SB. Financial toxicity of cancer treatment. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8:788.
  3. Ramsey S, Blough D, Kirchhoff A, et al. Washington state cancer patients found to be at greater risk for bankruptcy than people without a cancer diagnosis. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32:1143-1152.
  4. Zafar SY, Peppercorn JM, Schrag D, et al. The financial toxicity of cancer treatment: a pilot study assessing out-of-pocket expenses and the insured cancer patient’s experience. Oncologist. 2013;18:381-390.
  5. Ramsey SD, Bansal A, Fedorenko CR, et al. Financial insolvency as a risk factor for early mortality among patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:980-986.
  6. Richey-Smith C, Burgess J, Mehringer E. Affordable drug options: a survey of what colleges and schools of pharmacy are teaching. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 2011;3:208-21
Related Items
Biodistribution and Shedding Analysis Following RP1 Oncolytic Immunotherapy Dosing in Patients From the IGNYTE Clinical Trial: Implications for Oncology Pharmacists
JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature published on March 21, 2024 in HOPA Abstracts
Characterizing Second-Line and Beyond Treatments for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphomas
JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature published on March 21, 2024 in HOPA Abstracts
Coordinating Better Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma: An Educational Initiative to Elevate Pharmacist Leadership in Novel Antibodies and CAR-T Therapy
JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature published on March 21, 2024 in HOPA Abstracts
Darolutamide, Enzalutamide, and Apalutamide for Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients in the United States (DEAR): Comparative Real-World Evidence
JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature published on March 21, 2024 in HOPA Abstracts
Dosing, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Combination Therapy With Darolutamide, Androgen-Deprivation Therapy, and Docetaxel for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in the ARASENS Study
JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature published on March 21, 2024 in HOPA Abstracts
Evaluating Patient Hesitancy in Receiving a Second Dose of Evusheld (Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab) for COVID-19 Prevention After a Food and Drug Administration Dosing Recommendation Update
JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature published on March 21, 2024 in HOPA Abstracts
First-Line Nivolumab + Ipilimumab + Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: CheckMate 9LA 4-Year Clinical Update
JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature published on March 21, 2024 in HOPA Abstracts
Improving Post-Transplant Vaccination Compliance via Implementation of a Clinical Pharmacist–Managed Service
JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature published on March 21, 2024 in HOPA Abstracts
Impact of Frailty on Outcomes After CAR T-Cell Therapy for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature published on March 21, 2024 in HOPA Abstracts
Incidence and Outcomes of Pneumonitis/Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients Receiving Trastuzumab Deruxtecan
JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature published on March 21, 2024 in HOPA Abstracts