Sign Up Now!
To sign up for our newsletter or print publications, please enter your contact information below.
First Name *
Last Name *
Email Address (Verify) *
We will request your mailing address on the next page.
We will request your mailing address on the next page.

Acquired Resistance Mutations After Treatment of EGFR-Mutated Metastatic NSCLC with Osimertinib plus Savolitinib (TATTON)

Conference Correspondent  - AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review

Resistance to the combination of osimertinib plus savolitinib is predominantly mediated by acquired mutations in either MET, EGFR, or KRAS in patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Up to 22% of patients with EGFR mutation–positive non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after progression on osimertinib have a MET amplification as a resistance mechanism.1 In the expansion cohorts (parts B and D) of the phase 1b TATTON study, patients with MET-amplified EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC who progressed on a prior EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) received osimertinib (80 mg) plus savolitinib (300 mg or 600 mg once daily). Osimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible, oral EGFR TKI. Savolitinib is an oral highly selective MET TKI.

The part B group of TATTON was split into 3 cohorts by prior therapy and tumor T790M status. Patients in part D had not received a third-generation EGFR TKI and were T790M negative. For patients who eventually develop resistance to the osimertinib plus savolitinib combination, it is not known which driver mutation(s) mediate this resistance.1

In the analysis presented at the American Association of Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021, researchers assessed paired plasma samples (collected at baseline) upon disease progression and/or treatment discontinuation up to a data cutoff date (March 4, 2020). Next-generation sequencing using either Guardant Health (Guardant360 73-gene panel) or Omni 500-gene panel was used to analyze the plasma ctDNA samples. All 73 genes on the Guardant360 panel were included in the Omni 500-gene panel. Analyses from each patient were reported only for genes included across the panels used. Genomic alterations were identified using Guardant Health’s pipeline, which included mutations and amplifications of EGFR and MET.1

Disease progression was assessed by the investigator, according to RECIST version 1.1. Assessments were completed for patients with progression-free survival (PFS) of >2 months.1

Of 180 patients who received treatment with osimertinib plus savolitinib, 70 provided plasma samples at baseline and at progression or discontinuation. Of these, 45 patients were used for the analysis: 18 of 70 were not evaluable for ctDNA detection and 7 of 70 had a PFS of ≤2 months.1

Among evaluable samples, the following acquired mutations were recorded with exclusivity between genes in most patients: MET D1228X, Y1230X, L1212X 20% (9 of 45); EGFR C797X – 16% (7 of 45); KRAS G12X, G13X – 11% (5 of 45); PIK3CA E545K – 4% (2 of 45).1

Seven of 9 patients who developed MET-based resistance developed more than 1 MET mutation, suggesting polyclonal resistance. Across both parts B and D, the resistance profiles appeared similar by prior EGFR-TKI status and by savolitinib dose.1

In this analysis, approximately half of all evaluable patients had an identifiable acquired resistance mechanism. Resistance to osimertinib plus savolitinib appeared to be predominantly mediated by either MET, EGFR, or KRAS. Co-occurring mutations across multiple genes were rare. However, multiple acquired mutations were often detected in a specific gene, particularly MET, which suggests to researchers that individual tumors showed inherent resistance dependencies.1

Reference
1. Markovets A, Han J-Y, Cho BC, et al. Acquired resistance in patients with EGFRm NSCLC following treatment with osimertinib plus savolitinib in the Ph1b TATTON study Parts B and D. Presented at: American Association of Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; April 10-15, 2021. Abstract CT024.

 

Related Items
2021 Midyear Review: Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Conference Correspondent  published on June 20, 2021 in AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review
Combination Therapies and New Molecular Targets—Presentations from AACR 2021
David Spigel, MD
Conference Correspondent  published on June 19, 2021 in AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review
Combination of Nivolumab and Chemotherapy in Nonmetastatic Resectable NSCLC (CheckMate-816)
Conference Correspondent  published on June 19, 2021 in AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review
Phase 3 Study of Tislelizumab Compared with Docetaxel in Advanced NSCLC (RATIONALE 303)
Conference Correspondent  published on June 19, 2021 in AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review
Randomized Phase 3 Study of Sintilimab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous NSCLC (ORIENT-3)
Conference Correspondent  published on June 19, 2021 in AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review
Safety Results of Phase 2 Study of Bintrafusp plus Chemotherapy in Advanced NSCLC (INTR@PID LUNG 024)
Conference Correspondent  published on June 19, 2021 in AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review
Phase 2 Study of Osimertinib + Oleclumab in Progressive T790M-Negative EGFR-Mutated NSCLC
Conference Correspondent  published on June 19, 2021 in AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review
Phase 2 Study of D-0316 in Patients with Advanced NSCLC and EGFR T790M Mutation
Conference Correspondent  published on June 19, 2021 in AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review
Phase 1 Trial of VS-6766, a Dual RAF-MEK Inhibitor, and Defactinib, an FAK Inhibitor
Conference Correspondent  published on June 19, 2021 in AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review
Phase 2 Study of DM-CHOC-PEN in Patients with NSCLC with Central Nervous System Involvement
Conference Correspondent  published on June 19, 2021 in AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review
Copyright © Green Hill Healthcare Communications, LLC. All rights reserved.