Skip to main content

Online PARP Inhibitor Education Has Positive Impact on Oncologists’ and OB/GYNs’ Knowledge and Confidence

Web Exclusives - Ovarian Cancer

Online education of clinicians improves knowledge and confidence in the ability to integrate poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in the treatment of newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer into clinical practice.

A study of oncologists and obstetricians/gynecologists released during the European Society of Gynecological Oncology Virtual Congress 2020 found an improvement in the number of correct responses measuring clinician knowledge, as well as a positive shift in confidence. As a result of participation in the activity, nearly half (47%) of the participants stated that they would modify patient treatment plans.

Results were presented by Geoff Fisher from Medscape Global Education, New York City, and colleagues.

The online education consisted of a 30-minute online video panel discussion with synchronized slides. The effect of the activity was measured by repeated-pairs pre-/post-activity, in which individual participants served as their own control. Answers to 3 multiple-choice knowledge questions, and 1 self-efficacy, 5-point Likert scale confidence question were analyzed.

A total of 157 oncologists and 152 OB/GYNs completed pre- and post-activity questions. Among the oncologists, the average number of correct responses on the 3-item multiple-choice activity improved from 59% before the activity to 74% after the activity. Among the OB/GYNs, the corresponding percentages were 48% pre- and 58% post-activity.

Participants with all 3 correct answers to the multiple-choice questions improved from 16% pre-activity to 44% post-activity among the oncologists, and from 11% pre- to 32% post-activity among the OB/GYNs.

Before the online education, only 18% of oncologists and 16% of OB/GYNs correctly answered questions on identifying data from the PRIMA trial of niraparib, compared with 48% and 41%, respectively, after the online education. Similar improvements were observed when participants were asked to identify data from the PAOLA trial for olaparib: 68% of oncologists and 53% of OB/GYNs answered correctly pre-activity, compared with 80% and 59%, respectively, post-activity.

Improvements in the percentage of correct responses post-activity were also observed for questions on identifying data from the PRIMA trial of niraparib (oncologists: 18% to 48%; OB/GYNs 16% to 41%) and the PAOLA trial data for olaparib (oncologists: 68% to 80%; OB/GYNs 53% to 59%).

Confidence in the ability to integrate PARP inhibitors into practice improved pre-activity to post-activity, with a total confidence shift of 14% for oncologists and 29% for OB/GYNs.

“This on-demand, online video panel discussion resulted in a positive educational impact,” the investigators concluded. “However, education gaps remain evident, especially among OB/GYNs. Online medical education, increasingly important during the COVID-19 pandemic, is valuable in supporting implementation of new treatment strategies and identifying areas of continued educational need.”

Related Items
How to Sequence Treatment in Relapsed Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Maintenance Gemogenovatucel-T Immunotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Patient Self-Reporting of Tolerability in Phase 2 Trial Comparing Gemcitabine plus Adavosertib or Placebo in Women with Platinum-Resistant Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Mirvetuximab Soravtansine plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
NeoPembrOV Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with or without Pembrolizumab Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery and Standard Systemic Therapy with or without Pembrolizumab for Advanced High-Grade Serous Carcinoma
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Optimal Treatment Duration of Bevacizumab plus Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Advanced Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Phase 1 Study of GAS6/AXL Inhibitor (AVB-500) in Recurrent, Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Carcinoma
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Anlotinib in Combination with TQB2450 in Patients with Recurrent Ovarian Cancer (ACTION)
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Niraparib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with BRCA-Mutated Ovarian Cancer from 3 Phase 3 Trials
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer
Real-World Treatment Patterns of Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
2021 Year in Review - Ovarian Cancer published on January 18, 2022 in Ovarian Cancer