Skip to main content
COMPLETED RESEARCH: PRACTICE MANAGEMENT
Abstract #PM03

Safety of Switching e-Prescribing Platform Body Surface Area Calculation from DuBois & DuBois to Mosteller on Active Chemotherapy Doses

JHOP - March 2021 Vol 11 Special Feature - HOPA Abstracts, Chemotherapy

Presenters: Nick Crozier, PharmD, BCPS, Pharmacy Director, UNM Cancer Center, UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center; Ronald Kittson, PharmD, Clinical Pharmacy Supervisor, UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center

Co-Authors: Lisa Anselmo, PharmD, BCOP, Clinical Pharmacy Director, Pharmacy, UNM Hospitals; Branda Chalenunphonh, Student Pharmacist, UNM College of Pharmacy

Background: Body surface area (BSA) is used to calculate individual doses for chemotherapeutic agents.1 Default BSA calculation equations vary between e-prescribing platforms. At the University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center (UNMCCC) our e-prescribing platform used DuBois & DuBois; however, because of the complexity of the DuBois & DuBois equation, our nurses and pharmacists use Mosteller. To improve safety, we changed our e-prescribing platform calculation to Mosteller.

Objective: To determine whether switching BSA calculation from DuBois & DuBois to Mosteller results in clinical differences in dose or in outcomes for patients receiving chemotherapy.

Methods: The UNMCCC switched from the DuBois & DuBois to Mosteller BSA calculation on July 6, 2020. We collected data that included changes in BSA, therapeutic dose changes, and adverse event reporting. We extracted data for all chemotherapeutic agents that required BSA dosing between May 1, 2020, and August 10, 2020, to compare chemotherapy doses given to patients before and after the calculation switch date. Patients who received the same chemotherapeutic agent as part of the same regimen at least once before and after July 6, 2020, were included. Only the latest chemotherapy dose before July 6, 2020, and the earliest dose after July 6, 2020, were evaluated. We used each patient’s most recent height and weight before July 6, 2020, to calculate predicted Mosteller BSA. Finally, we examined individually all dose increases by ≥5%, for safety.

Results: A total of 227 patients who received a total of 367 doses were evaluated. In all, 234 doses had no change, 10 doses increased by 5% to 10%, and 6 doses increased by >10%. We calculated the predicted patient BSA change corresponding to 330 of the doses. Of the predicted BSA changes, 23% were expected to increase by ≥2.5% and 6.67% were expected to increase by 5% to 10%. Predicted BSA changes correlated poorly with dose changes (r2 = 0.0058). Most doses remained unchanged because of physician manual calculations, use of previous BSA option, and pharmacist dose adjustment and rounding. Dose increases of >10% were caused by changes in the patient’s weight and provider’s chemotherapy regimen adjustment. There were no adverse events reported or safety concerns.

Conclusion: Switching the e-prescribing platform BSA calculation from DuBois & DuBois to Mosteller resulted in an overall increase in our patients’ calculated BSA, without significant clinical impact on the patients’ dose or outcome. The change from DuBois & DuBois to Mosteller can be safely made in clinical practice for patients receiving active chemotherapy.

  1. Fancher KM, Sacco AJ, Gwin RC, et al. Comparison of two different formulas for body surface area in adults at extremes of height and weight. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2016;22:690-695.
Related Items
Assessing Student Pharmacists’ Knowledge and Perceptions of Financial Toxicity Concepts Introduced in an Oncology Pharmacotherapy Course
JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature published on March 21, 2024 in HOPA Abstracts
Biodistribution and Shedding Analysis Following RP1 Oncolytic Immunotherapy Dosing in Patients From the IGNYTE Clinical Trial: Implications for Oncology Pharmacists
JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature published on March 21, 2024 in HOPA Abstracts
Characterizing Second-Line and Beyond Treatments for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphomas
JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature published on March 21, 2024 in HOPA Abstracts
Coordinating Better Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma: An Educational Initiative to Elevate Pharmacist Leadership in Novel Antibodies and CAR-T Therapy
JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature published on March 21, 2024 in HOPA Abstracts
Darolutamide, Enzalutamide, and Apalutamide for Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients in the United States (DEAR): Comparative Real-World Evidence
JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature published on March 21, 2024 in HOPA Abstracts
Dosing, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Combination Therapy With Darolutamide, Androgen-Deprivation Therapy, and Docetaxel for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in the ARASENS Study
JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature published on March 21, 2024 in HOPA Abstracts
Evaluating Patient Hesitancy in Receiving a Second Dose of Evusheld (Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab) for COVID-19 Prevention After a Food and Drug Administration Dosing Recommendation Update
JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature published on March 21, 2024 in HOPA Abstracts
First-Line Nivolumab + Ipilimumab + Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: CheckMate 9LA 4-Year Clinical Update
JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature published on March 21, 2024 in HOPA Abstracts
Impact of Frailty on Outcomes After CAR T-Cell Therapy for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature published on March 21, 2024 in HOPA Abstracts
Improving Post-Transplant Vaccination Compliance via Implementation of a Clinical Pharmacist–Managed Service
JHOP - March 2024 Vol 14 Special Feature published on March 21, 2024 in HOPA Abstracts