Sign Up Now!
To sign up for our newsletter or print publications, please enter your contact information below.
First Name *
Last Name *
Email Address (Verify) *
We will request your mailing address on the next page.
We will request your mailing address on the next page.

Racial Disparities in Biomarker Testing and Clinical Trial Enrollment in NSCLC

Conference Correspondent  - AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review

Rates of comprehensive biomarker testing and clinical trial participation were significantly lower for black patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the United States compared with white patients.

Racial disparities exist at many levels in the healthcare system, including cancer care screening to timely diagnosis and treatments received, as well as clinical trial enrollment. This study investigated differences in black versus white race among patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent biomarker testing and enrolled in clinical trials in the United States.1

This retrospective observational study reviewed data from the Flatiron Health database, which includes longitudinal data of patients with advanced and metastatic NSCLC. Patient data were considered if the patient had received systemic therapy between January 1, 2017, and October 30, 2020. Descriptive analyses summarized differences by race in biomarker testing and trial enrollment. Multivariable regression examined the relationship between these factors.1

Data for a total of 14,768 patients were evaluated: 9793 (66.3%) of the patients were white and 1288 (8.7%) were black.1 Most white patients (76%) and black patients (74%) underwent at least a single molecular test or comprehensive genomic analysis (P = .03).1 Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed among 50% of white patients and 40% of black patients (P <.0001).1 Clinical trial participation was observed among 4% of white patients and 2% of black patients (P = .0002).1

There was a statistically significant association between race (white vs black) and both biomarker testing (ever vs never) and trial participation (yes vs no) (both P <.001, unadjusted chi-square).1 Differences in NGS testing, baseline biomarker testing, and race remained statistically significant (P <.01) in adjusted regression analyses.1

Receipt of first-line targeted therapy was comparable between white and black patients (10% and 9%, respectively; P = .24).1 First-line use of pembrolizumab plus carboplatin plus pemetrexed was observed among 20% of white patients and 20% of black patients; carboplatin plus paclitaxel was observed among 16% and 17%, and single-agent pembrolizumab was observed among 14% and 15%, respectively.1

Use of NGS-based testing, which is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Guidelines in Oncology for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, is the most notable disparity among black patients, with a >10% difference in receipt of this testing versus white counterparts. This may contribute in part to more than double the rate of participation in clinical trials observed among white patients since many second-line and later-line trials use molecular targets as inclusion criteria. While multiple factors are known to affect healthcare disparities, access to and receipt of appropriate biomarker testing may be an attainable goal to ensure equal access to quality care.1

Reference

1. Bruno DS, Hess LM, Li X, et al. Racial disparities in biomarker testing and clinical trial enrollment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Presented at: 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting; June 4-8, 2021. Abstract 9005.

Related Items
2021 Midyear Review: Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Conference Correspondent  published on June 20, 2021 in AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review
Phase 2 Study of DM-CHOC-PEN in Patients with NSCLC with Central Nervous System Involvement
Conference Correspondent  published on June 19, 2021 in AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review
Clinical Outcomes for Plasma-Based Genomic Profiling versus Tissue Testing in Advanced NSCLC (NILE)
Conference Correspondent  published on June 19, 2021 in AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review
Pooled Analyses of Immune-Related Adverse Events and Efficacy from IMpower130, IMpower132, and IMpower150
Conference Correspondent  published on June 19, 2021 in AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review
Anti–PD-L1 Therapy in Combination with Chemotherapy versus Immunotherapy Alone in First-Line NSCLC with PD-L1 Score 1% to 49%
Conference Correspondent  published on June 19, 2021 in AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review
Two-Year Update from CheckMate-9LA Study of Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced NSCLC
Conference Correspondent  published on June 19, 2021 in AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review
Comparison of Aumolertinib and Gefitinib in First-Line Treatment of EGFR-Mutated NSCLC
Conference Correspondent  published on June 19, 2021 in AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review
Rucaparib in High Genomic Loss of Heterozygosity and/or BRCA1/2-Mutated NSCLC (Lung-MAP Sub-Study, S1900A)
Conference Correspondent  published on June 19, 2021 in AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review
Capmatinib in MET Exon 14–Mutated Advanced NSCLC (GEOMETRY Mono-1 Study)
Conference Correspondent  published on June 19, 2021 in AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review
Atezolizumab versus Best Supportive Care After Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resected NSCLC (IMpower010)
Conference Correspondent  published on June 19, 2021 in AACR & ASCO 2021 - Midyear Review
Copyright © Green Hill Healthcare Communications, LLC. All rights reserved.