Click Here to
News, Updates,
& More
Stay Up
to Date

Ceritinib Effective in Treating Brain Metastases in NSCLC

Web Exclusives - ESMO
Phoebe Starr

Barcelona, Spain—Treatment with ceritinib (Zykadia) led to excellent responses in patients with ALK-positive non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases, according to results of the ASCEND-7 clinical trial, which enrolled only patients with ALK-positive NSCLC with newly diagnosed or progressive brain metastases.

Ceritinib treatment resulted in intracranial responses in up to 51.5% of patients, including patients with or without previous exposure to crizotinib or to radiation therapy for brain metastases.

“This is exciting data from one of the first studies to be presented that evaluates ceritinib in patients with active brain metastases. Ceritinib had intracranial activity in this trial consistent with its known extracranial activity. Intracranial responses were rapid, high, and durable across all study arms. Although intracranial responses are reported with other second-generation ALK inhibitors, the eligible criteria were not homogeneous across studies,” said lead investigator Laura Q. Chow, MD, FRCPC, Associate Director of Clinical Research, LIVESTRONG Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin.

Brain metastases occur in approximately 50% of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC and are associated with poor outcomes. Crizotinib is approved as front-line treatment for ALK-positive NSCLC, but resistance develops in most patients, leading to progressive disease. Ceritinib is a second-generation ALK inhibitor approved by the FDA for first- and second-line treatment for ALK-positive NSCLC. Other FDA-approved second-generation ALK inhibitors include alectinib (Alecensa) and brigatinib (Alunbrig).

Study Details

The phase 2, open-label ASCEND-7 clinical trial had 4 treatment arms, including 42 patients who received previous treatment with brain radiotherapy and crizotinib (arm 1); 40 patients who received previous treatment with crizotinib only (arm 2); 12 patients with previous brain radiotherapy only (arm 3); and 44 patients unexposed to previous crizotinib or to brain radiotherapy (arm 4).

Ceritinib 750 mg daily was given in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Baseline characteristics were comparable in the 4 arms.

High rates of whole-body response were observed across all 4 arms. For arms 1, 2, 3, and 4, the objective response rate was 35.7%, 30%, 50%, and 59.1%, respectively, in patients naïve to brain radiotherapy and crizotinib therapy. Disease control rates were 66.7%, 82.5%, 66.7%, and 70.5%, respectively.

Intracranial response was evaluated in 28, 29, 7, and 33 patients in the respective arms in those with measurable brain metastases at baseline. The intracranial objective response rates were 39.3%, 27.6%, 28.6%, and 51.5%, respectively. The intracranial disease control rates were 75%, 82.8%, 85.7%, and 75.8%, respectively. Most responses were observed within 2 months.

“Duration of response was clinically meaningful. In arm 4, median duration of response was 9.2 months. The range of median whole-body progression-free survival was 5.6 months to 7.9 months in all 4 arms,” Dr Chow said.

The median overall survival was 24 months in arm 1 and not evaluable in the other arms.

Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were infrequent. The most common adverse events of all grades occurring in more than 50% of patients across all arms were diarrhea, nausea, transaminitis, vomiting, and decreased appetite. Most of these were grade 2.

Study Implications

Commenting on the ASCEND-7 study, Lizza E. Hendriks, MD, PhD, Pulmonary Disease, Maastricht University Medical Center, Netherlands, said the results showed that penetration of the blood–brain barrier is important in treating patients with NSCLC and brain metastases.

“Disease control rates were high in all treatment arms, and duration of response, including intracranial response, was substantial. Ceritinib performed as expected, and the trial was well executed,” Dr Hendriks said. “We now know from ASCEND-7 that ceritinib should be taken at 450 mg/day with food, which is better tolerated than the original regimen of 750 mg/day without food. This revised dosing regimen will reduce toxicity associated with ceritinib,” Dr Hendriks added.

Noting that it is difficult to compare next-generation ALK inhibitors without head-to-head studies, Dr Hendriks said, “in general, all appear to be effective in the brain with good duration of response.”

Related Items
Targeted Therapy with Olaparib Beneficial in Metastatic Prostate Cancer with Gene Mutations
Phoebe Starr
Web Exclusives published on February 24, 2020 in ESMO
Paradigm Shift: PARP Inhibitors Should Be Offered to All Patients with Ovarian Cancer
Phoebe Starr
Web Exclusives published on February 18, 2020 in ESMO
Long-Term Data Confirm Survival Benefit for Pembrolizumab in Advanced NSCLC
Phoebe Starr
Web Exclusives published on November 25, 2019 in Lung Cancer
Adding CDK4/6 Inhibitor to Endocrine Therapy Improves Survival in Advanced Breast Cancer: New Standard of Care
Phoebe Starr
Web Exclusives published on October 28, 2019 in ESMO, Breast Cancer
FDA Unveils Pilot Program to Expand Access to Investigational Oncology Drugs
Phoebe Starr
Web Exclusives published on July 29, 2019 in ASCO
MURANO: Venetoclax-Rituximab at Fixed Duration Beats Chemo­immunotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory CLL
Phoebe Starr
JHOP - March 2019 Vol 9, No 1 published on March 13, 2019 in ASH
Researchers Identify First Mutation to Explain Resistance to Venetoclax
Phoebe Starr
JHOP - March 2019 Vol 9, No 1 published on March 13, 2019 in ASH
Checkpoint Inhibitor a New Approach to Jump-Start a Waning Response to CAR T-Cell Therapy
Phoebe Starr
JHOP - March 2019 Vol 9, No 1 published on March 13, 2019 in Immunotherapy, ASH
Durable Responses to CAR T-Cell Therapy in B-Cell Lymphomas
Phoebe Starr
JHOP - March 2019 Vol 9, No 1 published on March 13, 2019 in Lymphoma, ASH
Explosive Development of BCMA CAR T-Cell Therapy for Multiple Myeloma
Phoebe Starr
Web Exclusives published on March 6, 2019 in Immunotherapy, Multiple Myeloma
Last modified: March 26, 2020