Adjusted Dosing and Schedule of Pemetrexed in Impaired Renal Function

JHOP - Sept 2016 Vol 6, No 3 - Lung Cancer
Download PDF
Zahava Ohana, PharmD
Amanda Brahim, PharmD, BCPS
Mohammed Ibrahim, RPh, BCOP, BCPS, BCACP

Background: Pemetrexed is a folate antimetabolite chemotherapy agent used for locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and mesothelioma. According to the product labeling, pemetrexed should not be used in patients with a creatinine clearance (CrCl) level <45 mL/min. Data are limited on the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed in patients whose renal function is below the recommended level.

Objective: To describe the use of pemetrexed in an elderly woman with stage IVa NSCLC whose CrCl level was <45 mL/min, with modified dosing and scheduling.

Case: Our patient, a 70-year-old woman, underwent 4 cycles of carboplatin and pemetrexed, then continued on maintenance pemetrexed for 51 doses. Initially, she received full doses (500 mg/m2) of pemetrexed every 3 weeks. At dose 14, a reduction to 400 mg/m2 occurred. At dose 16, the treatment interval was extended to every 4 weeks because edema developed in her right lower extremity, accompanied by reduced renal function. Throughout 4 years of treatment, the patient reported minimal toxicities and her disease remained stable. During treatments, her CrCl level ranged from 25 mL/min to 55 mL/min.

Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first published report of pemetrexed use at a reduced dose and extended frequency interval for maintenance therapy in a patient with a CrCl level <45 mL/min. The patient experienced minimal adverse effects and tolerated the treatment for more than 4 years despite impaired renal function. Larger long-term studies are warranted to fully evaluate the efficacy and safety of using alternative doses and scheduling intervals in such patients.

J Hematol Oncol Pharm.
2016;6(3):103-107
www.JHOPonline.com

Disclosures are at end of text

Pemetrexed (Alimta) is a pyrrolopyrimidine-core folate analog metabolic inhibitor that disrupts the folate-dependent metabolic processes essential for cell replication.1 Pemetrexed exhibits its antineoplastic activity by inhibiting several key enzymes in the de novo synthesis of purine and pyrimidine nucleotides in neoplastic cells, resulting in cellular cytotoxicity.2,3

This chemotherapeutic agent was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2004 for treatment of locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and mesothelioma.1 Currently, pemetrexed is indicated for initial treatment of nonsquamous NSCLC in combination with cisplatin; as single-agent maintenance treatment if the disease has not progressed after 4 cycles of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy; and as single-agent treatment after previous chemotherapy.1 It is also indicated for the treatment of mesothelioma in combination with cisplatin in patients whose disease is unresectable or who otherwise are not candidates for curative surgery.1 Although cisplatin is indicated in the product labeling, carboplatin is often substituted.4

After pemetrexed is transported into tumor cells via membrane carriers (eg, the reduced folate carrier and membrane binding protein transport systems), its metabolites compete with reduced folate and inhibit the 3 enzymes of the folate metabolic pathway (thymidylate synthase [TS], dihydrofolate reductase, and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase [GARFT]), which halts the nucleotide synthesis and growth of tumor cells.5 In the tumor cells, the enzyme folylpolyglutamate synthetase rapidly and efficiently converts pemetrexed into polyglutamate forms.1,5 Polyglutamated pemetrexed has higher affinity and inhibitory activity for TS and GARFT. Polyglutamation is a time- and concentration-dependent intracellular process that occurs more rapidly and efficiently in tumor cells than in normal cells.1

Latz and colleagues analyzed the population pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed in 10 phase 2 clinical trials in patients with cancer.6 When administered over 10 minutes as an intravenous (IV) infusion, pemetrexed has a half-life of 3.5 hours, plasma protein binding of 73.4% to 81%, and substantial renal excretion (70%-90% of unchanged drug).6,7 It was concluded that total systemic clearance (ie, area under the curve [AUC]) correlates inversely with renal function, and that body surface area correlates positively with central volume of distribution.6-8 Therefore, decreased renal function results in increased total systemic exposure of pemetrexed. Consequently, the AUC (but not the Cmax) was the responsive primary determinant of toxicity of pemetrexed. These findings suggest that dose adjustment should be based on renal function.6-8

Mita and colleagues conducted a phase 1 clinical study to determine the toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and recommended doses of pemetrexed in patients with cancer who had normal or impaired renal function.7 Patients received ≥500 mg/m2 of pemetrexed as a 10-minute infusion every 3 weeks. Hematologic toxicities were common, occurred in all treatment groups, and did not correlate with renal function. Neutropenia tended to decrease with vitamin B12 and folic acid supplementation regardless of pemetrexed dose, but the study groups were too small to perform a meaningful statistical analysis of this effect. Nonhematologic toxicities such as fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea occurred infrequently in the study and did not appear to be related to renal function. Pemetrexed plasma clearance correlated positively with the patients’ glomerular filtration rate (GFR), whereas systemic exposure to the drug correlated inversely with GFR. Accrual of patients with a GFR <30 mL/min was discontinued after a patient with a GFR of 19 mL/min died as a result of treatment-related toxicities.

The patient had received a 150-mg/m2 dose of pemetrexed, which caused grade 4 stomatitis, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, and grade 3 fatigue. With vitamin B12 and folic acid supplementation, patients with a GFR ≥80 mL/min tolerated pemetrexed 600 mg/m2, and those with a GFR of 40 mL/min to 79 mL/min tolerated pemetrexed 500 mg/m2. The investigators concluded that the pemetrexed dose of 500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks is safe along with vitamin B12 and folic acid supplementation in patients with a GFR ≥40 mL/min. Because the study did not provide sufficient evidence to determine the appropriate dose adjustment for patients with a GFR <40 mL/min, pemetrexed has not been recommended for use in such patients. Moreover, the prescribing information states that pemetrexed should be avoided in patients whose creatinine clearance (CrCl) level is below 45 mL/min.1

We report on a patient with adenocarcinoma of the lung and impaired renal function for whom adjustments were made to the maintenance doses and frequency of pemetrexed administration.

Case Report
A 70-year-old woman presented in April 2011 with complaints of dyspnea during exertion. A chest x-ray was obtained and showed right-sided pleural effusion. After her initial thoracentesis, which was performed in March 2011 at a different facility, the cytology was positive for malignant cells consistent with primary adenocarcinoma of the lung. A computed tomography (CT) scan showed multiple nodular densities in the right lung along with a small residual effusion. The patient was diagnosed as having stage IVa adenocarcinoma of the lung secondary to malignant pleural effusion. However, there was no evidence of extrathoracic disease or involvement of the central nervous system. The patient’s medical history included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteoporosis, anxiety/depression, anemia, and vasculitis. Her surgical history was significant for left breast lumpectomy (30 years earlier) and tonsillectomy. The patient admitted to a 25 pack-year smoking history and daily consumption of 1 to 2 glasses of wine.

At the time of presentation, her home medications and supplements included aspirin (81 mg daily), fluticasone/salmeterol (500/50 µg, 1 puff twice daily), albuterol (2 puffs every 4 hours, as needed), alendronate (70 mg weekly), tiotropium (1 puff daily), multivitamin (1 tablet daily), calcium (500 mg twice daily), megestrol (400 mg twice daily), and bupropion sustained release (150 mg daily).

Chemotherapy-related supplements and medications included pemetrexed, carboplatin, folic acid (1 mg daily), vitamin B12 (1000 µg intramuscularly every 3 cycles of chemotherapy), and granisetron (3.1 mg/24-hour patch every week). Her premedication steroid regimen consisted of dexamethasone 4 mg orally, every 12 hours, starting the day of chemotherapy and extending for 3 days, and dexamethasone 8 to 10 mg IV immediately before treatment. She also received antinausea medication prior to chemotherapy (either granisetron [1 mg IV], palonosetron [0.25 mg IV], or ondansetron [16 mg IV]).

Her CrCl level at presentation was 48 mL/min according to the Cockcroft-Gault equation. Other laboratory values are listed in Table 1. In March 2011 the decision was made by the oncologist to initiate first-line treatment of carboplatin plus pemetrexed for advanced NSCLC. The tumor was anaplastic lymphoma kinase negative, with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor.

Table 1

During a physical examination prior to the first treatment with pemetrexed plus carboplatin, the patient reported worsening of the dyspnea and complained of anorexia and fatigue. Her performance status was not documented before treatment initiation, but her status at dose 2 was 1 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale. Initial physical examination revealed extremities that were free of edema. Table 2 provides a brief summary of the treatment cycles, doses, CrCl ranges, and comments noted in the patient’s medical record.

Table 2

Two weeks after dose 13 of maintenance therapy, edema developed in the patient’s right lower extremity. She was examined by her primary care physician, and ultrasound findings were negative for deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Physical examination showed extremities with edema (grade 1+) and discoloration of the right leg. It was decided to lower her dose of pemetrexed to 400 mg/m2 starting at maintenance dose 14 and to continue the dosing schedule of every 3 weeks.

Dose 15 was held due to worsening edema in the patient’s right lower extremity. Physical examination showed discolored extremities with grade 2+ right pedal edema, which were tender on palpation. Ultrasound findings were negative for DVT. After a 6-week hiatus from chemotherapy and significant improvement in the edema, it was decided that chemotherapy at 400 mg/m2 would be resumed on a 4-week-interval dosing schedule. The oncologist had a thorough discussion with the patient and her husband about the risks and benefits of proceeding with maintenance chemotherapy (prior to dose 20), with a CrCl level of 35 mL/min and persistent right lower extremity edema. With a reduced dose and extended frequency, the patient continued the modified regimen, with limited adverse effects and toxicities.

Other than the edema, the patient has not experienced any significant toxicities throughout maintenance chemotherapy. The oncologist believed that she had a vascular component superimposed on drug toxicity. The discomfort in her right lower extremity improved considerably and flared only for 1 or 2 days following each treatment. A Doppler study performed April 2012 showed no significant peripheral artery disease. Her disease has remained stable.

Maintenance dose 27 was held because of mild dehydration (blood urea nitrogen level of 24 mg/dL), elevated serum creatinine (1.1 mg/dL), and upper respiratory infection. Mometasone/formoterol (100/5 µg) was added to the patient’s treatment. Her performance status after treatment initiation was 1 or 2 on the ECOG scale after the initiation of mometasone/formoterol. Since maintenance dose 27, she remained at performance status 1 or 2 until her last visit at our facility. Occasional wheezing was heard in both lungs.

In January 2014, after dose 42, the patient reported slight swelling of her left leg. Her primary care physician (PCP) ordered ultrasonography of both legs, and findings were negative for blood clots. The patient stated that she was prescribed furosemide 10 mg by mouth, as needed by her PCP. One month later, she was receiving furosemide 10 mg by mouth daily from her PCP.

At maintenance dose 49, the patient’s dose of pemetrexed was reduced to 350 mg/m2 because of decreasing renal function, evident by a CrCl level of 25 mL/min.

Until October 2014, her CT scans obtained throughout treatment (since 2011) showed no evidence of active disease or progression of disease. Her baseline serum creatinine level had remained relatively stable, at approximately 0.8 mg/dL (CrCl, 48 mL/min), with a peak level of 1.5 mg/dL (CrCl, 25 mL/min) on dose 51 visit lab tests.

In October 2014, a routine CT scan demonstrated a new pulmonary nodule as well as a new thymus nodule, both of which were scheduled to be re-evaluated by CT scan 3 months later. However, the patient transferred to another facility for continuation of care.

Discussion
According to the prescribing information, pemetrexed is to be dosed at 500 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 21-day cycle, in combination with cisplatin 75 mg/m2; maintenance therapy for pemetrexed continues at 500 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 21-day cycle.1,9 The drug is eliminated primarily by the renal system, and CrCl levels are used to evaluate and monitor before and during treatment with pemetrexed. Patients whose CrCl level is ≥45 mL/min do not require dose adjustment. Pemetrexed is not recommended for patients with a CrCl level of <45 mL/min.1 According to the package insert, there is insufficient evidence to determine appropriate dose adjustments for such patients.1

Premedication recommendations include oral supplementation with folic acid (350-1000 μg daily) and intramuscular administration of vitamin B12 (1000 μg before the first pemetrexed dose).10,11 Vitamin supplementation reduces pemetrexed-related toxicities without compromising its efficacy.10 This premedication regimen usually is initiated at least 1 week before the first pemetrexed cycle and is continued for ≥3 weeks after the last cycle. However, pemetrexed therapy should not be delayed for the purpose of premedication in patients who do not have deficiencies in folate or vitamin B12, because the duration of vitamin supplementation before the first dose of pemetrexed does not affect the occurrence of pemetrexed-related toxicities.10

The major dose-limiting hematologic side effect of pemetrexed is myelosuppression (specifically neutropenia), and the common nonhematologic side effects include elevation of hepatic enzyme levels. Other typical toxicities are rash, mucositis, nausea, and vomiting.12

We conducted a PubMed search, limited to the past 10 years, using the term pemetrexed with the following key terms: every 4 weeks, every 28 days, extended dosing interval, renal insufficiency, renal impairment, reduced dosing, elderly, and geriatrics. Relevant articles are summarized below, particularly as they relate to our case report.

Gridelli and colleagues retrospectively analyzed 2 large randomized studies to evaluate the survival rates and safety of treatment with pemetrexed in elderly patients relative to younger patients.13 The first study by Scagliotti and colleagues enrolled 1725 patients. In this first-line treatment study of pemetrexed with cisplatin versus cisplatin and gemcitabine, 1252 patients with nonsquamous NSCLC were included; 32.7% of the patients were aged ≥65 years and 12.8% ≥70 years.13,14 In the second study, Ciuleanu and colleagues assessed single-agent pemetrexed with placebo in the maintenance setting (N = 663); 481 patients with nonsquamous NSCLC were included, of which 33.1% were aged ≥65 years and 16% were aged ≥70 years.9,13 All patients had performance status of 0 or 1 before treatment.

Results from the Scagliotti study showed that the incidences of grade 3/4 toxicities associated with combination pemetrexed-cisplatin therapy were significantly lower compared with the comparator treatment (gemci­tabine-cisplatin). Specifically, neutropenia was reported in 15.1% versus 26.7%, thrombocytopenia in 4.1% versus 12.7%, and anemia in 5.6% versus 9.9%, respectively.14 Ciuleanu and colleagues demonstrated the incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities with maintenance pemetrexed versus placebo as well tolerated (neutropenia 3%, anemia 3%, leukopenia 2%).9 Fatigue, nausea, and vomiting appeared unrelated to age.13 Investigators of the retrospective analysis concluded that for patients aged ≥65 years with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC and performance status of 0 or 1, pemetrexed has a favorable toxicity profile and, therefore, is a viable option, either in combination with cisplatin as first-line treatment or as maintenance therapy after initial chemotherapy.13

It appears that edema is a rare complication of pemetrexed. In our patient, this side effect led to a dose reduction and an extension of the dosing interval (to every 4 weeks). The team determined that this was a vascular component superimposed on drug toxicity. D’Angelo and colleagues identified 14 patients with stage IV adenocarcinoma of the lung who received pemetrexed therapy (300-500 mg/m2) and experienced peripheral edema and erythema of the lower extremities.15 The median time of edema occurrence was dose 8 (range, doses 3-23). The edema was resolved by dose reduction (5 patients) or by discontinuation of treatment (8 patients). DVT was ruled out in 13 of the 14 patients. Treatment included antibiotics, diuretics, or prednisone.

For some patients with renal dysfunction, drugs that are eliminated renally, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), may reduce renal excretion of pemetrexed and result in toxicity.1 NSAIDs with longer half-lives should be discontinued at least 5 days before pemetrexed treatment in patients with mild or moderate renal insufficiency, and NSAIDs with shorter half-lives should be discontinued 2 days before pemetrexed treatment.1 After completion of pemetrexed therapy, NSAIDs should be avoided for at least 2 days.1 Ibuprofen (400 mg 4 times daily) reduces pemetrexed clearance by approximately 20% (and increases AUC by 20%); however, patients with normal renal function (CrCl level, ≥80 mL/min) may receive ibuprofen concurrently with pemetrexed.1 For patients with mild or moderate renal insufficiency (CrCl level, 45-79 mL/min), concomitant administration of ibuprofen and pemetrexed should be carefully monitored.1 Aspirin at low to moderate doses (eg, 325 mg every 6 hours) does not influence the pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed.1 Our patient was taking aspirin 81 mg daily during pemetrexed treatment.

The higher incidence of adverse effects associated with pemetrexed use in patients with reduced renal function has been well documented. Results of a Japanese retrospective analysis by Kono and colleagues, published in 2014, elucidated the risk factors for pemetrexed-related toxicities in the presence of reduced renal function.16 Thirty-eight patients with CrCl <45 mL/min who received pemetrexed were evaluated for neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and nausea of grade 3 or higher. These severe side effects developed in 13 (34%) patients. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that a CrCl level below 30 mL/min (P = .033) and concomitant use of NSAIDs (P = .012) were significant risk factors for adverse events. Currently, only the abstract of their article is available in English. The frequency of administration is not stated in the abstract.

Our patient had a relatively high risk for renal dysfunction because of her age (>65 years) and smoking history. Although she was taking aspirin 81 mg daily, the pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed should not be affected by such a low dose.

Conclusion
To our knowledge, this is the first report of pemetrexed being used successfully as long-term maintenance treatment for nonsquamous NSCLC, with a reduced dose and extended interval between cycles. Pemetrexed is generally well tolerated with appropriate supportive care, but the lack of data for patients with renal impairment limits its use in this population. An extensive individual risk-versus-benefit analysis must be conducted before deciding to use pemetrexed in any patient with renal impairment.

Author Disclosure Statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References
1. Alimta (Pemetrexed) [package insert]. Indianapolis, IN; Eli Lilly and Company; 2013. www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/021462s021lbl.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2014.
2. Hanauske AR, Chen V, Paoletti P, Niyikiza C. Pemetrexed disodium: a novel antifolate clinically active against multiple solid tumors. Oncologist. 2001;6:363-373.
3. Molina JR, Adjei AA. The role of pemetrexed (Alimta LY231514) in lung cancer therapy. Clin Lung Cancer. 2003;5:21-27.
4. Zukin M, Barrios CH, Pereira JR, et al. Randomized phase III trial of single agent pemetrexed versus carboplatin and pemetrexed in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2849-2853.
5. Shih C, Chen VJ, Gossett LS, et al. LY231514, a pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine-based antifolate that inhibits multiple folate-requiring enzymes. Cancer Res. 1997;57:1116-1123.
6. Latz JE, Chaudhary A, Ghosh A, Johnson RD. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of ten phase II clinical trials of pemetrexed in cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2006;57:401-411.
7. Mita AC, Sweeney CJ, Baker SD, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of pemetrexed administered every 3 weeks to advanced cancer patients with normal and impaired renal function. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:552-562.
8. Rinaldi DA, Kuhn JG, Barrios HA, et al. A phase I evaluation of multitargeted antifolate (MTA, LY231514), administered every 21 days, utilizing the modified continual reassessment method for dose escalation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1999;44:372-380.
9. Ciuleanu T, Brodowicz T, Zielinski C, et al. Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care for non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2009;374:1432-1440.
10. Kim YS, Sun JM, Ahn JS, et al. The optimal duration of vitamin supplementation prior to the first dose of pemetrexed in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2013;81:231-235.
11. Rollins KD, Lindley C. Pemetrexed: a multitargeted antifolate. Clin Ther. 2005;27:1343-1382.
12. Adjei AA. Pharmacology and mechanism of action of pemetrexed. Clin Lung Cancer. 2004;5(suppl 2):S51-S55.
13. Gridelli C, Brodowicz T, Langer CJ, et al. Pemetrexed therapy in elderly patients with good performance status: analysis of two phase III trials of patients with nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2012;13:340-346.
14. Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, von Pawel J, et al. Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3543-3551.
15. D’Angelo SP, Kris MG, Pietanza MC, et al. A case series of dose-limiting peripheral edema observed in patients treated with pemetrexed. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6:624-626.
16. Kono M, Sakata Y, Sugawara T, et al. Assessment of risk factors for adverse events due to pemetrexed in patients with reduced renal function. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2014;41:2587-2590.

Related Items
Alectinib New Standard of Care for ALK-Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Phoebe Starr
TOP - November 2017, Vol 10, No 4 published on November 13, 2017 in Lung Cancer
Osimertinib Extends Progression-Free Survival in EGFR T790M–Positive Lung Cancer with CNS Metastases Myeloma
Wayne Kuznar
TOP - November 2017, Vol 10, No 4 published on November 13, 2017 in Lung Cancer
Dacomitinib Represents Potential New Targeted Therapy for EGFR Mutation–Positive Lung Cancer
TOP - November 2017, Vol 10, No 4 published on November 13, 2017 in Lung Cancer
Highlights from Best Practices in Lung Cancer Navigation Summit
TON - Supplements published on May 16, 2017 in Lung Cancer
Managing Immune-Related Toxicities in Patients with Lung Cancer
Meg Barbor, MPH
TOP - May 2017, Vol 10, No 2 published on May 5, 2017 in Lung Cancer
Plinabulin Improves Survival in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Chase Doyle
TOP - May 2017, Vol 10, No 2 published on May 5, 2017 in Lung Cancer
Projected Long-Term Survival High for Patients with Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Pembrolizumab
Chase Doyle
TOP - May 2017, Vol 10, No 2 published on May 5, 2017 in Lung Cancer
Managing Immune-Related Toxicities in Patients with Lung Cancer
Meg Barbor, MPH
TON - March 2017, Vol 10, No 2 published on March 7, 2017 in Lung Cancer
E-Cigarettes: The New Threat to Public Health
Meg Barbor, MPH
TON - March 2017, Vol 10, No 2 published on March 7, 2017 in Lung Cancer
Novel Cytotoxic Drugs Still Play an Important Role in the Treatment of Lung Cancer
Meg Barbor, MPH
TOP - February 2017, Vol 10, No 1 published on February 1, 2017 in Lung Cancer
Last modified: August 25, 2016