Click Here to
Subscribe
Breaking
News, Updates,
& More
Stay Up
to Date

Comparison of Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Filgrastim, tbo-Filgrastim, and Filgrastim-sndz in Patients with Cancer Receiving Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy and Patients with Severe Chronic Neutropenia

Conference Correspondent  - Conference Correspondent, ASHP

Colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) have been used in the United States since 1991, since the approval of filgrastim, and regulate the production of neutrophils within the bone marrow. CSFs are indicated for use in cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy, patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving induction or consolidation chemotherapy, cancer patients receiving bone marrow transplant, patients undergoing peripheral blood progenitor cell collection and therapy, and patients with severe chronic neutropenia. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy, cost, and adverse effects of filgrastim, tbo-filgrastim, and filgrastim-sndz in a community hospital.

All 3 CSFs are currently being used at Indian River Medical Center (IRMC), and the data have been collected through the IRMC electronic medical record to compare the efficacy, cost, and adverse effects of the 3 products. The following data will be collected: age, sex, ethnicity, white blood cell (WBC) trends, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) trends, intravenous anti-infective use, incidence of bone pain, incidence of nausea, length of stay, and hospital costs. They also will review the 6 months of utilization data for each product: filgrastim, tbo-filgrastim, and filgrastim-sndz.

The investigators’ primary outcome will be the comparison of WBC count and ANC trends among the 3 products, and the difference in the length of stay and hospital costs among patients receiving each medication. The secondary end point that will be tested is the incidence of bone pain and nausea of each CSF product. The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of each product will be evaluated using the student t test and chi square analysis. The investigators anticipate the study will begin in early 2017.

Patel M. Abstract presented at ASHP Midyear Clinical Meeting. Las Vegas, NV; December 2016.

Related Items
A Look at SIRT Y-90 and the SARAH Trial
Valérie Vilgrain, MD
Videos published on May 11, 2017 in Conference Correspondent, Video, ILC
Nursing Implications of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy
Conference Correspondent  published on May 4, 2017 in Conference Correspondent, ONS
Neratinib After Trastuzumab-Based Adjuvant Therapy in Early-Stage HER2+ Breast Cancer: 5-Year Interim Analysis from the ExteNET Trial
Conference Correspondent  published on May 4, 2017 in Conference Correspondent, ONS
Alternative Dosing Schedules to Manage Adverse Events in Patients with Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Receiving Sunitinib
Conference Correspondent  published on May 4, 2017 in Conference Correspondent, ONS
Treatment-Related Adverse Events with Nivolumab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma in the Phase 2 CheckMate-205 Study
Conference Correspondent  published on May 4, 2017 in Conference Correspondent, ONS
Implication of Rituximab Priming Practices
Conference Correspondent  published on May 4, 2017 in Conference Correspondent, ONS
Standardization of Patient Assessments and Administration Guidelines for Blinatumomab
Conference Correspondent  published on May 4, 2017 in Conference Correspondent, ONS
What Is the Status of Immunotherapeutic Agents Playing a Role in the Treatment of SCLC, and How Should Oncology Nurses Educate and Prepare Patients?
Conference Correspondent  published on May 4, 2017 in Conference Correspondent, ONS
Turning on the Light Switch: Development and Implementation of an Immunotherapy Program for a Community-Based Oncology Practice
Conference Correspondent  published on May 4, 2017 in Conference Correspondent, ONS
Identifying and Treating Cytokine Release Syndrome
Conference Correspondent  published on May 3, 2017 in Conference Correspondent, ONS
Last modified: February 20, 2019